Internet
Atlas
of Cartographic Methods

Scientific work financed from the means for science in the years 2010-2012, as research project N N526 073838 entitled Formalization of Cartographic Presentation of Quantitative Data and its Implementation in the Internet "Atlas of Cartographic Methods of Presentation"

« Back to the start page

Because of wide access to computer analytic and graphic tools, geographic information systems, and data availability, visualization of quantitative data by means of thematic maps is simple indeed these days. They may successfully replace lengthy descriptions, exceeding them in efficiency of conveying information. A thematic may is irreplaceable for presentation of spatial dependencies, which we will surely be unable to show by means of tables or diagrams.

One should enjoy the ever growing amount of thematic maps. However, there is a certain condition to be fulfilled. For the quantitative thematic maps to perform their functions, they must be edited correctly in essence. Their content and form have to be adequate to the task they have to meet.

It will not be a misuse to state that a great majority of published thematic maps is edited in a way that is unwise or not in line with the principles of graphics. One can look for reasons of that in many factors. The first one, and perhaps the most important one is that most often the thematic map is not a "high importance" document, thus the consequence of its incorrect preparation will be merely less efficient provision of information, or slight disinformation. Another factor is the function performed by thematic maps. Oftentimes they are just illustrations, making the text more attractive, introducing some dynamics into the static columns of newspapers. Surely, the consequences of a badly prepared map published in press are not as serious as the consequences of a badly edited large scale topographic map, being - among other things - the basis of complex spatial analyses. A thematic map that is edited fully correctly will hurt merely the most inquisitive users, and professional cartographers. The latter not necessarily so, as various schools of cartography consider various edition assumptions correct.

Lack of specialist knowledge, experience, or just the graphic intuition of authors make some maps leave much to be desired. It is a fact, that such maps are often made by people without cartographic knowledge. It is important, however, for cartographers to define clearly the principles of applying specific methods of cartographic presentation, and also to have those principles reflected, e.g. in graphic solutions applied in GIS-type systems. Wanting to fight for correct application of cartographic methods of presentations, one should begin with lack of their classification and formalization. That, undoubtedly, is one of the challenges for cartographic methodology, important both for traditional cartography, and for interactive cartography, or the visualization of data, understood widely. Also studies on map perception cannot be neglected, as they provide the practical verification of theoretical assumptions; since not everything that is theoretically assumed may "work" in practice.

The aim of our project is to properly arrange the knowledge concerning the application of cartographic methods of presentation, and to connect that with preparation of classification of methods, and formalization of selected quantitative methods. Formalization of methods is then meant to serve for preparation of interactive internet-provided Atlas of Cartographic Methods. Our general assumption is to make it easier for all those interested to edit quantitative thematic maps correctly. We do not make use of any available software related to geographic information systems, reminding of the subsequent steps of map development "step by step", in a way which allows to understand the sense of a cartographic presentation.

The Atlas is composed of four parts. The history of cartographic symbolisation has been described in part one. Part two is a diagram of proceeding "step by step", allowing a correct preparation of a thematic map. In this part the most important elements of the process of cartographic visualization have been discussed. Part three consists of papers concerning theoretical base of cartographic methods of presentation (methods of cartographic symbolization). An essential portion of that part is a concise characteristic of five forms of presentation, colloquially referred to as cartographic methods. Thorough knowledge of features of each form of presentation is the basis for correct compilation of maps. Finally, part four comprises a set of examples of "filling with content" the diagram provided in part two. The results are interactive large-scale illustrations, which provide the forms of cartographic presentation, containing maps made in such a way that their modification is possible, as well as checking whether the image obtained is correct.

For the clarity of reasoning, we introduce in the project, following J. Korycka-Skorupa (2002), the differentiation between "method" and "form". A "method" is a manner of proceeding which ensures reaching the expected result, it is going step by step from data to a map. In our case, the effect, the map is the "form" of presentation, which - due to properties we refer to as diagram or choropleth map. In the project we focus - in a great majority of cases - upon the methods of reaching various forms of presentation, as similar forms may be obtained using different methods. e.g. a dasimetric map.

Knowing the features of data, the map author may, or even should, confront them with the properties of presentation forms. An important issue here seems to be the formalization of cartographic methods. The more formalized the procedures from data to map, the easier the task of making a correct and logical cartographic presentation.

In our study we shall apply the terminology used in Polish cartographic literature (J. Szaflarski 1965, K. Kocimowski, J. Kwiatek 1976, L. Ratajski 1989, J. Pasławski [ed.] 2010) with slight changes (cf. J. Pasławski 2005). In succession, features of basic forms of presentation shall be introduced, which will allow to define the procedural paths, that is methods of presentation. We would like to make five forms of presentation the subject of analyses (diagram, choropleth method, iso-lines, dots, quantitative signatures) used for the presentation of data expressed in quantity or in order. A further step will be turning the formalized methods into software, and developing a prototype of the system enabling selection of methods and forms of spatial data visualization.

*   *   *

Kocimowski K., Kwiatek J., 1976, Wykresy i mapy statystyczne (Statistical diagrams and maps), Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.
Korycka-Skorupa J., 2002, Od danych do mapy cz.I i II. (From data to a map, parts 1 and 2) "Polski przegląd Kartograficzny", Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 91-102 (part I), No. 3, pp. 175-188 (part II)
Pasławski J., 2005, Uwagi o klasyfikacji ilościowych form prezentacji kartograficznej (Remarks on classification of quantitative forms of cartographic presentation), "Polski Przegląd Kartograficzny" Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 95-100.
Pasławski J. (ed.), 2010, Wprowadzenie do kartografii i topografii. Wydanie II (Introduction to cartography and topography. 2nd edition ), Wrocław: Nowa Era.
Ratajski L., 1989, Metodyka kartografii społeczno-gospodarczej. Wydanie II (Methodology of socio-economic cartography. 2nd edition), Warszawa-Wrocław: Polskie Przedsiębiorstwo Wydawnictw Kartograficznych.
Szaflarski J., 1965, Zarys kartografii. Wydanie II (Cartographic Basics. 2nd editon), Warszawa: Państwowe Przedsiębiorstwo Wydawnictw Kartograficznych.

 


© Department of Cartography
Faculty of Geography and Regional Studies · University of Warsaw · 2010-2012